Lumiere film My friends invited me to a private screening of the documentary, the film vividly reflects the Mexican prison system today announced a murder suspect Antonio by an eyewitness who has poor evidence, the judge, the executor as a judge, bailiff and several defender Rafael Heredia, are the protagonists of a true Roman, and other depressing drama, but certainly show the gross current poor state of the country’s criminal law.
The Civil Code protects the elements of personal image in 1916, noting that “to repair the damage, the one who insults the honor, to life, or self-image of a person. ” So it is only when caught in an illegal manner and cause damage.
How is a week that began proyecc ions in theaters, a lawsuit was filed by the witness, “to try to catch the hunter,” argues that screening was illegal because known he does not have permission to publish the image on the film, to be in demand, at first glance appears to be unfounded, but because the film is not a movie but a documentary about the reality and in this sense, the witness has no right uncomfortable at the edge, it is not an achievement, but as I said a real situation.
alleged censorship: After several attempts, the cinema exhibition as a preliminary injunction of Judge Dominguez White Wolf finally ordered the confrontation ended with the decision of the Supreme Court to enforce Office that their projection is legal because the state must guarantee to stop the right to information, a fundamental right in Article VI of the Constitution of the United States from Mexico.
The film is a lot to say in principle, the filmmakers are the work of all studies will be filmed to record events and I also suspect that this proposal has already been asked by Congress is appropriate and I hope that the solution to this problem be, but the film shows more than one defect in the judicial system: – The elimination of evidence of the accused behind bars shows the debt in court – the corruption in the prison for the welfare of prisoners, – the lack of training of judges, – the lack of impartiality of the judge in the case. – The lack of a reliable database to prevent theft and occupation continues, that the accused be defended by a lawyer, among other things
To be honest, the work of Rafael Heredia plausible and courageous work, not only freedom he now enjoys Antonio, but the dissemination of facts and adjust the system.
